Lawyer Vasilika Hysi was threatened with her life by Rrjoll protesters, reacts: The court decides on properties, not politics

2026-03-06 19:26:53 / AKTUALITET ALFA PRESS

Lawyer Vasilika Hysi was threatened with her life by Rrjoll protesters, reacts:

Tensions over a property in the Rrjoll area of ​​Velipoja continue to escalate, between several protesters claiming ownership and heir Fatmir Shpellzaj, who claims to have won all final court decisions.

After the episodes of violence against the latter's family members, the lawyer in the case has also reacted publicly.

In a public statement, Hysi states that there has been pressure, intimidation and threats in recent days, emphasizing that the property conflict cannot be resolved through violence or political pressure, but through law and the courts.

Full reaction

I am closely following the recent statements made by representatives of the Opportunity Party regarding the property issue in Rrjoll.

I want to say it clearly and unequivocally:

Property is not determined by politics. Property is determined by law.

In a state of law, the owner of a piece of land is not determined by political statements, television studios, or emotional narratives, but by legal documents and court decisions.

Any attempt to turn a property issue into a political battle is irresponsible and seriously undermines trust in justice.

At the same time, I express my full solidarity with the Shpellzaj family, which has recently faced serious acts of violence and intimidation.

Domestic violence, threats, and physical or psychological pressure have no place in a society that claims to function on the basis of law.

No property conflict can and should not be resolved by violence.

Violence is not an argument. Violence is a crime.

As a lawyer representing the party in this process, I want to make it very clear:

Public or political pressure will not affect the exercise of my duties.

I will continue to defend my client's rights solely on the basis of the law, documents and court decisions.

Because in the end, one principle remains unchanged:

Property is not acquired by violence or loud shouting, but by right.

If someone says that "Property belongs to the owner," then this principle should be stated in full:

Property belongs to the one who proves it with documents and by law.

Not to the one who speaks the loudest.

Not to those who exercise violence and exert public pressure.

Not to the one who tries to turn justice into a political debate.

Property conflicts are resolved in court.

And only the law decides there.

 

Happening now...