"Kamikaze without any benefit to the public" - The clash between Berisha's journalist and Rama, the translator: This girl is unprofessional

2026-03-14 21:02:39 / POLITIKË ALFA PRESS

"Kamikaze without any benefit to the public" - The clash between

Yesterday's clash between SyriTV journalist Ambrozia Meta and Prime Minister Edi Rama "got the point" and became the most discussed topic of these two days.

Meanwhile, through a post on her Facebook account, journalist and translator Albana Nexhipi Lekaj reacted. She stated that the way journalist Ambrozia Meta communicated with the Prime Minister is offensive to any journalist who has a clear position.

Adding further that: " The journalist asks questions, investigates, does not argue with the person being questioned as if it were a joke (unless it is to be factored without any professional merit), because it diverts them from the issue. The journalist asks questions with dignity, and if there is ambiguity, continues with questions, not with arguments."

Albana Nexhipi Lekaj further emphasized that the analysis should be done with facts, suggesting that the journalist should find the synchronicity of what Rama claimed to have said (ie prison for those who do not pay the electricity) and, by finding this, expose him as a "fraudster", and in this way "the public would understand it for themselves".

" It seems to me that they are unnecessarily factoring this girl, because it doesn't seem to me that she is doing any professional journalism. Simply a suicide bomber without any benefit to the public. But, let me be wrong! I am for ethics in communication. I EMPHASIS: The question had a star. That quarrel, mysybe t" concludes her status Lekaj.

I could be very wrong, but the way journalist Ambrozia Meta communicates with Rama is insulting to any journalist who has a clear position. The journalist asks questions, investigates, does not argue with the person being questioned as if it were a joke (unless it is to be factored without any professional merit), because it diverts them from the issue. The journalist asks questions with dignity, and if there is any ambiguity, continues with questions, not with arguments. And then analyzes the answer with facts, with a good montage. Did Rama say "Prison for those who don't pay the electricity"? Find the synchronicity and attachment to what Rama says, making him a fraud. And the public understands it for itself. It seems to me that they are factoring this girl in vain, because it does not seem to me that she is doing any professional journalism. Simply a suicide bomber without any benefit to the public. But, let me be wrong! I am for ethics in communication.


I EMPHASIS: The question had a star. That quarrel, mysybet

Happening now...